THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- PIECE OF SHIT
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUM OF THE EARTH
PATRICK PARIS -- SCUMBAG
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER




In article <25YP0S8M38648.7544560185@anonymous.poster>
Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:

In addition that *that* arrogance, already explained, he had the outragousness

to send *this* message.

On Sun,  4 Jan 2004, Anonymous Sender <anonym...@remailer.metacolo.com>
wrote:

On 4 Jan 2004, <admin@[CENSORED].dynu.com> wrote:

You are afflicted with [SOD OFF]ing self-[BLOCKED]ness. How long before you
filter out discussions of [WRONG SPEECH]? [BAD THOUGHT]? [SOD OFF]?
[BANNED]? What else is
"[FLAKE OFF] in civilized discourse" in [FORGET IT]'s [HATE THOUGHT]
little world of
[NICHEVO]ing [VERBOTEN] [NO WAY]ness?

I would defend to the death your right to express your opinion.

Only if your right to free speech does not conflict with [NIEMALS]/[VERBOTEN]

opinions

of what free speech is.

Not at all: the Congo Remailer is open to all opinions, the more diverse,
the better. I treat all messages like the Crown Jewels, faithfully
transmitting them, with due care to obscure any information about the
origin of the message.

[CENSORED]/[NO WAY] = The Net [SOD OFF]

Congo = The Civil Remailer.

[In the interests of promoting civility,
one or more crude expressions have been replaced
with a stamp, in brackets, to symbolize their
unacceptability in civilized discourse]

I love that disclaimer - dare I say it, it's so symbolic.
While the idea behind it is reprehensible, reading that just cracked me
up.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Serious question, related to this "Pangborn" stuff

On Sun, 16 Oct 2005 19:50:52 +0000, AD wrote:

OF COURSE YOU DO DAVEY!

My name isn't Davey.  I know you're paranoid, kook, but perhaps you can
get the idea that everyone isn't "Moore".

And as usual, I note that you have no comments on the actual facts which
prove you again and again to be full of shit.

you know, all you have to do is use common sense and have a bit of decency and
when somebody named john smith points out that he is being harassed in some
newsgroup you block mail to that newsgroup that mentions john smith.

sure, there might be another john smith using the newsgroup, but the chances are
there is not and even if there is isn't it worth protecting the victim john smith
at the expense of the other john smith seeing his name in the newsgroup if it
happened to be mentioned in a message that went through your remailer, which is
pretty unlikely since this john smith is not a victim so posts in the newsgroup
mentioning his name would probably come directly from the sender. and what are the
chances that both john smiths would be mentioned in posts coming through your
remailer at about the same time? pretty remote i would say.

it seems pretty simple to me and if you cannot see it maybe it is because you do
not want to see it.

it is clear to me as an observer that remailer operators are by and large children
and mentally ill 'adults'.

i wish Frog would return.

failing that I hope eelbash will continue rather than take another vacation.

aside from those two i have nothing but contempt for remailer operators and think
that pangborn is right and they are a lot of sickos playing with toys, but with
toys that can hurt people, and maybe it is best if there is one too many free
insane speech incidents and finally after one more terrorist attack some demagogic
privacy-hating politician manages to get a law passed to shut down these pathetic
and disgusting children's toys because that is all they are.

of course all you mentally ill children will blame Frog rather than yourselves.

<<==========>>

Subject: reserving theright to do it

reserving theright to do it
at some time in the
futureMoore do you
consider me pointing out
that you wont see any of
the high percentage of

 But you are probably cor
rect They only  have
VANDALS and PUNKS
No I think the REAL stal
ker is the cone who FOLL
OWS somebody into 
newsgroup after newsgroup