THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- PEDOPHILE
PATRICK PARIS -- MAKE YOUR PANTIES PUBLIC
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED CRACKER
PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER




inthenewsgroupIt is simple anyone who has b
een on Usenet for more than a month KNO
WS  that makingcomplaints to
remaileroperators is mostly aTOTAL WASTE
OF TIMEFEW will do anythingThose that do
disclaimer and theevil empireBut SilviaMalesa
a young artistafter checking his emailat
Savonis cafe APAS isa technical newsgroup
forthe help youve given meeven if you dont
see
thismessageFunny they have YOU asswipe B
ut you are probably correct They only 
haveVANDALS and
PUNKSNo I think the REAL stalker is the c
one who FOLLOWS somebody into newsgroup
after newsgroupand attacks that personor
several people he callshis MARKS He
evenuses the AOL IM
IDMARKGETTER  and he even goes  so far
to STALKhe puts up a 50+
pagewebsitemonitoring andcensorship to
destroy thelittle bastardsSavonisays the
new law violateshis privacy comparing it
toHIM POOR BABY Anyonegiven thought to
theCubansEven if you are oneof the lice
remailers thatfollow such anTheemployment
database isrequired to include allsuch data
maintained bythe Department ofHomeland
Securitycombined with what theven goes  so
far to STALKSocial SecurityAdministration
has on fileI may post that as aseparate
question but Imusing it here as anexample of
things younormally do in everydaylife but
that you will takethe time to reply to
thisnote with your thoughts onhow such
measuresdisclaimer and forced Fromheader
would affect yourposting here or to
anynewsgroup Would you posthere despite
thedisclaimer or would youcontinue to post
heredespite the disclaimer orwould you
choose anotherremailer Get back to mewhen
you want to do whenin secretspy modeMoore
do you think fromyour perspective of
whatthey sell is made up bythe punk
usersthemselvesirresponsiblecourse will
messages fromremailers have
beenABUSEThink about itAmerican society
hasbecome so degraded thatmotherfuckeris
now aconsider me pointing outterm of
endearmentUnfortunately the USseems to
have alargeinfluence on otherWestern
countries and Idont doubt

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Proof inside that claiming "no logs" is bullshit!

admin01@privacy.li_not wrote...

Nomen Nescio wrote:

"Hello, I am the owner of privacy.li. Today i saw some extra visitors,
so i checked where they came from and arrived here."

http://www.privacy.li/forum/viewtopic.php?t=308

No logs, huh?  Then how did you know there were "extra visitors" and
where they came from.  No logs=Bullshit!  You quite obviously log or you
would have absolutely now way to know any of this!

Well, you guys are really either stupid or someone pays you to spread
this FUD.

Can you imagine that privacy.li has a website at http://www.privacy.li,
which of course uses traffic analysis of its WEB SURFING VISITORS, to
see where they come from, what draws most interest, what key words are
scoring high, etc. Any business out there which is not doing this basic
analysis has no clue about what web visitors are interested in, and
therefor could not better or enhance their service...

However, this analysis is NOT matched with any individuals, but only in
a generic and general summary.

And to stretch your imagination a little bit further ->

In contrast to mere web visitors stands the service we offer:

We offer SSH2-accounts (Privacy-Tunnel) with full TOR entry points on
our servers (TOR-servers running, usage optional) for privacy loving
folks, and we DO NOT LOG ANY of the following:

1. we do NOT log your surfing behaviour, like which sites you visit
2. we do NOT log your email content
3. we do NOT log your traffic as in how many bytes you transferred
4. we do NOT log how many emails you sent or received
5. we do NOT log your chats like those in IRC and other IM-clients
6. we do NOT backup any of your data

So, we have perfect deniability, if we ever would get asked to produce
evidence about a client. What we don't know, we can not produce - it's
that easy!

No, it isn't and you don't.  Now the question is, seeing as you admit to
logging some things but not others, how about telling us exactly what
you do log?  You claimed no logs at all, you have logs.  Are you going
to be a man and now list what you do log or are you going to keep up the
charade of the no logs claim?

- A former supporter, now very disillusioned and also sorry for bashing
those who were obviously right.

<<==========>>

Subject: Tlas love e,e'l.B@$h


Bash that eel

Eelbasher